Sheffield Steel Corp. v. HMK Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Sheffield Steel Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in denying summary judgment to defendant on issue of unreasonably small capital, explaining that the evidence was “mixed,” adding that “[b]oth parties have submitted evidence of profits and losses, availability of credit, industry trends and projections over the periods in question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).