Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 3/30/2015

Sheetz v. Norwood

Citations

  • 608 F. App'x 401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The defendants are correct that the domestic-relations exceptions would bar [the plaintiff] from seeking to ‘void’ the state court’s custody orders.”
  • “no court of appeals has ever concluded that a provision of [Title IV-D] creates a private right of action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Kanne, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.