· 3/28/1985
Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union 420 v. Kinney Air Conditioning Co.
Citations
- 756 F.2d 742
- 118 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3398
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29850
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to challenge an arbitral award in a collective bargaining dispute, \[t]he party alleging evident partiality must establish specific facts which indicate improper motives on the part of the [arbitrators]\
- noting that the party alleging evident partiality must establish specific facts that indicate improper motives
- holding party bound even though the management representatives on the board were owners of companies that were union contractors in the same geographic area and had a pecuniary interest in the outcome that was adverse to Kinney
- \Even repeated rulings against one party to the arbitration will not establish bias absent some evidence of improper motivation.\
- “Even repeated rulings against one party to the arbitration will not establish bias absent some evidence of improper motivation.”
- the arbitrator was alleged to have a financial interest in the outcome of the arbitration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcon, Browning, Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.