Skip to main content
· 3/28/1985

Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union 420 v. Kinney Air Conditioning Co.

Citations

  • 756 F.2d 742
  • 118 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3398
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to challenge an arbitral award in a collective bargaining dispute, \[t]he party alleging evident partiality must establish specific facts which indicate improper motives on the part of the [arbitrators]\
  • noting that the party alleging evident partiality must establish specific facts that indicate improper motives
  • holding party bound even though the management representatives on the board were owners of companies that were union contractors in the same geographic area and had a pecuniary interest in the outcome that was adverse to Kinney
  • \Even repeated rulings against one party to the arbitration will not establish bias absent some evidence of improper motivation.\
  • “Even repeated rulings against one party to the arbitration will not establish bias absent some evidence of improper motivation.”
  • the arbitrator was alleged to have a financial interest in the outcome of the arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Browning, Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.