Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local 19 v. Herre Bros., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the employer had presented “no facts which ... create a genuine issue of fact” as to the existence of a section 9(a) relationship
• “... the distinction between 8(f) and 9(a) significantly affects the analysis concerning withdrawal from a multiem-ployer bargaining unit....”
• discussing the formation of a CBA under § 9(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).