Sheerer v. Kanavel

Citations

• 106 Kan. 220
• 187 P. 658
• 1920 Kan. LEXIS 489

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Agency — Sale of Live Stock — Commissions. The jury were asked whether the defendant company was to receive any remuneration for the sale of the live stock shipped by one claimed by the plaintiff to to have been the defendant’s agent, other than as commission merchant, and answered, “We don’t know.” Held, that this answer is equivalent to “No,” and means that nothing more than the commission was to be received.</p> <p>2. Same, The testimony examined, and held not to show the agency claimed by the plaintiff.</p> <p>3. Same. It was improper to receive testimony of statements made by the alleged agent as to his own agency.</p>