Sheerer v. Bullock's Adm'r

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the protestor had standing as an interested party to challenge a procuring agency’s decision, after evaluating several procurement options such as obtaining the services from a commercial vendor, to in-source the services previously performed by the protestor
• finding that it had § 1491(b)(1) jurisdiction over insourcing decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).