Skip to main content
· 3/28/2024

Sheena Reel v. Joshua Steven Reel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating tax fraud conviction where jury had convicted defendant of bribery under legally invalid theory and was instructed that bribes were not deductible
  • “[T]he government need not trace the federal funds received by an organization to the project in connection with which its employee received a bribe.”
  • “When ... one element of the offense is implicit in the statute, rather than explicit, and the indictment tracks the language of the statute and fails to allege the implicit element explicitly, the indictment fails to allege an offense.”
  • “When . . . the jury has been presented with several bases for conviction, one of which is invalid as a matter of law, and it is impossible to tell which ground the jury selected, the conviction must be vacated.”
  • “When . . . the jury has been presented with several bases for conviction, one of which is invalid as a matter of law, and it is impossible to tell which ground the jury selected, the conviction must be vacated.” (citing Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298, 312 (1957

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.