Skip to main content
· 5/29/2002

Sheen v. the Time Inc. Magazine Co.

Citations

  • 817 So. 2d 974
  • 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7397
  • 2002 WL 1058514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that documents filed of record concerning discovery “may, but do not always, constitute sufficient record activity”
  • “[N]ot every document filed in a case qualifies as record activity ... the activity must constitute an affirmative act calculated to hasten the suit to judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shevin, Sorondo, and Ramirez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.