Skip to main content
· 8/16/1977

Sheehan v. Zoning Commission

Citations

  • 173 Conn. 408
  • 378 A.2d 519
  • 1977 Conn. LEXIS 865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff had a right to amend his appeal of a zoning board decision within 30 days of filing
  • failure to provide a proper bond or recognizance may be cured by filing an amendment
  • \The failure to include a party defendant in the citation is not a defect curable by amendment and renders the appeal subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction.\
  • failure to provide a proper bond or recognizance as required by General Statutes § 8-8 is a curable defect which does not deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction
  • citation is direction to officer to summon agency whose decision is being appealed
  • citation is direction to officer to summon agency whose decision is being appealed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: House, Cotter, Bogdanski, Longo, Speziale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.