Sheehan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Essential to establishment by the state of the offense charged was a showing that [the defendant's] entry into the premises had previously been expressly forbidden.\
• “Essential to establishment by the state of the offense charged was a showing that [the defendant’s] entry into the premises had previously been expressly forbidden.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hinton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-05· cited 15×
• State v. Harper
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-02-19· cited 5×
• Taylor Ann Hinton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-05

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rayburn v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-03-01· cited 20×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1973-10-25· cited 18×
• Hope v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-10-16· cited 8×
• W. L. N. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-04-11· cited 7×
• Osborne v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-03-07· cited 6×
• Alexander v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-11-20· cited 6×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-01-28· cited 4×