Sheehan v. Sheehan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “the trial court has the discretion to award [a party] interest, accruing from entry of the final judgment of dissolution, on those sums that should have been distributed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cintron v. King
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-11· cited 7×
• Goldstein v. Goldstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-27· cited 3×
• Shinitzky v. Shinitzky
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-17· cited 1×
• ANDREW J. MATTHEWS v. THERESA L. MATTHEWS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Plichta v. Plichta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-29· cited 40×
• Matajek v. Skowronska
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-31· cited 24×
• Nichols v. Nichols
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 22×
• Karimi v. Karimi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-13· cited 21×
• Golden v. Golden
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-02-09· cited 12×
• Benz v. Benz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-13· cited 4×