Sheehan v. Koonz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘The fact that there are no issues of federal law in the present case . . . does not . . demand the conclusion that abstention is appropriate [particularly as] [t]here is no indication that the sate-law issues raised in this case are particularly complex or unsettled.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).