Sheehan v. City of Gloucester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that section 2244(d) does not permit the reinitiation of 26 the limitations period that has ended before the state petition was filed”
• holding that Waltreus does not preclude federal habeas review
• “[S]ection 2244(d) does not permit the reinitiation of the limitations period 26 that has ended before the state petition was filed,” even if the state petition was timely filed
• “Under California law, the interpretation of contract language is a question of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).