Shedrick v. Shedrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mailing a copy of the motion to modify to the nonmovant does not comply with requirements set forth in § 52-50
• by prescribing the methods of service of postjudgment motions in the context of alimony and support, General Statutes § 46b-86 (a), the legislature is preserving the due process rights of the opposing party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Simms v. Zucco
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-08-23· cited 3×
• Hane v. Hane
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-06-30
• Coury v. Coury
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-11-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-18· cited 349×
• Turner v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-18· cited 182×
• Sanchione v. Sanchione
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-08-16· cited 125×
• Caltabiano v. Planning & Zoning Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-06-27· cited 124×
• Verrastro v. Sivertsen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-24· cited 123×
• Darak v. Darak
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-21· cited 111×
• Paddock v. Paddock
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-07-17· cited 47×
• Suprenant v. City of New Britain
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-08-25· cited 9×