Skip to main content
· 8/4/1988

Shebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.

Citations

  • 544 A.2d 377
  • 111 N.J. 276
  • 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1385
  • 1988 N.J. LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that material issue of fact existed concerning whether employer orally promised to discharge employee only for cause
  • holding that material issue of fact existed concerning whether employer orally promised to discharge employee only for cause
  • holding that under New Jersey common law, employers may terminate employment for cause or for no cause at all, in the absence of an express employment contract to the contrary
  • explaining that Woolley pertained to established company-wide termination policies and not individual oral promises related to employment
  • stating that questions of waiver are questions of intent, which are factual determinations
  • oral promise of discharge for cause only, even though employment was terminable at will, may be enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garibaldi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.