Sheats v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘Slight evidence of a defendant’s identity and participation from an extraneous source is all that is required to corroborate the accomplice’s testimony and thus support the verdict. The necessary corroboration may be by circumstantial evidence.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pitts v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-05-07· cited 27×
• Dunn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-01-11· cited 7×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-02-29· cited 19×
• Burgess v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-01-08· cited 11×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-07-14· cited 5×