Skip to main content
· 4/20/1976

Shea v. State Employees' Retirement Commission

Citations

  • 170 Conn. 610
  • 368 A.2d 159
  • 1976 Conn. LEXIS 1054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • individual had property interest in receipt of benefits once application had been approved, although benefits had not yet been provided
  • because commission had power to reconsider finding that plaintiff was eligible to receive disability benefits, even though such finding was initially approved by commission, finding was not res judicata
  • because commission had power to reconsider finding that plaintiff was eligible to receive disability benefits, even though such finding was initially approved by commission, finding was not res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: House, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Longo, Barber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.