· 4/20/1976
Shea v. State Employees' Retirement Commission
Citations
- 170 Conn. 610
- 368 A.2d 159
- 1976 Conn. LEXIS 1054
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- individual had property interest in receipt of benefits once application had been approved, although benefits had not yet been provided
- because commission had power to reconsider finding that plaintiff was eligible to receive disability benefits, even though such finding was initially approved by commission, finding was not res judicata
- because commission had power to reconsider finding that plaintiff was eligible to receive disability benefits, even though such finding was initially approved by commission, finding was not res judicata
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: House, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Longo, Barber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.