Shay Derrick Hughes v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that the district court could have conditioned intervention on existing case-specific deadlines remaining intact
• finding that participation through filing briefs as amici curiae sufficiently allowed appellants to make known their concerns and noting “that the concerns of an entity seeking intervention can be presented with complete sufficiency through such participation”
• explaining that timeliness partially turns on the stage of the litigation
• affirming denial of motion to intervene as of right and noting that the same analysis applies equally to permissive intervention
• \The determination of whether a motion to intervene is timely should be evaluated in the context of all relevant circumstances.\
• district court set an expedited case management plan, adhered to strict deadlines, and disposed of case within ten and a half months after it was filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).