Shawn Ray Evans v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 63 S.Ct. 454, 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943
• holding that review may be “unnecessary if it would be pointless or futile, such as where there is an alternative and sufficient basis for the result” (citations omitted)
• emphasizing that SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 63 S.Ct. 454, 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943
• holding that an adjudicative order could properly apply only to parties before the agency
• noting that courts are not required to \convert judicial review of agency action into a ping-pong game\ where \remand would be an idle and useless formality\
• noting that courts are not required to “convert judicial review of agency action into a ping-pong game” where “remand would be an idle and useless formality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).