Shawn Manning v. Stephen Huffman, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a presumption of prejudice was appropriate in a habeas case where an alternate juror participated in jury deliberations, even absent evidence that the error affected the jury’s deliberations and its verdict
• noting that the Olano Court made it \quite clear\ that in some situations a presumption of prejudice is appropriate and concluding that an alternate juror's participation in deliberations was sufficient to show prejudice
• noting that \several state and federal courts have held that [a] defendant may establish prejudice simply by showing that alternates actually participated in jury deliberations\
• noting that the Olano court made it \quite clear\ that in some situations a presumption of prejudice is appropriate and concluding that an alternate juror's participation in deliberations was sufficient to show prejudice
• noting that the Olano court made it “quite clear” that in some situations a presumption of prejudice is appropriate and concluding that an alternate juror’s participation in deliberations was sufficient to show prejudice
• evidence that an alternate juror actively participated in jury deliberations, including an instruction to the alternate to “‘take part in the discussions and deliberations,’” was sufficient to demonstrate prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).