Shawhart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument of the appellant that a city council did not qualify as a “civil service board” under the language in section 27-9-114
• rejecting an argument that a city council did not qualify as a civil service board under section 27-9-114 when it was effectively sitting as a civil service board rather than as a legislative body
• addressing a city employee’s discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).