Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a parent waived a claim that DCS failed to provide appropriate unification services by failing to object in the juvenile court
• holding that a parent’s failure to question the adequacy of services in the juvenile court precludes such challenge on appeal
• holding that “a parent who does not object” to the services provided is precluded from challenging a severance order’s reasonable-efforts finding
• holding that parent waived challenge to adequacy of reunification services by raising it for the first time on appeal
• holding that when “the court finds that [DCS] has made reasonable efforts to provide such services . . . , a parent who does not object in the juvenile court is precluded from challenging that finding on appeal”
• holding a parent may waive concerns about services if not timely raised in superior court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).