Shaw v. Whirlpool Financial Corp. (In Re the Appliance Store, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Rule 23(a)(2) does not require that all questions of fact or of law be common to every class member. It only requires the existence of a common nucleus of operative facts or the existence of common questions of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).