Shaw v. Underwood

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 845

Syllabus

In a case where there was evidence for and against a jury's conclusion that the plaintiff's health problems were not proximately caused by the car collisions at issue in the case, the trial court did not err in failing to sua sponte grant a directed verdict or grant a motion for a new trial. The trial court did not err in admitting the lay opinion testimony of a witness who was involved in one of the collisions about his perceptions of whether the plaintiff's vehicle suffered damage in the accident.