· 2/15/2001
Shaw v. Sargent School District No. Re-33-J Ex Rel. Board of Education
Citations
- 21 P.3d 446
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 901
- 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 293
- 2001 WL 125905
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[C]ontractual language must be interpreted in light of existing law, the provisions of which are regarded as implied terms of the contract, regardless of whether the agreement refers to the governing law.” (quoting 11 Williston on Contracts § 30:19 (4th ed. 1999))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dailey, Metzger, Vogt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.