Skip to main content
· 2/15/2001

Shaw v. Sargent School District No. Re-33-J Ex Rel. Board of Education

Citations

  • 21 P.3d 446
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 901
  • 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 293
  • 2001 WL 125905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]ontractual language must be interpreted in light of existing law, the provisions of which are regarded as implied terms of the contract, regardless of whether the agreement refers to the governing law.” (quoting 11 Williston on Contracts § 30:19 (4th ed. 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dailey, Metzger, Vogt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.