Skip to main content
· 6/30/1982

Shaw v. Russell Trucking Line, Inc.

Citations

  • 542 F. Supp. 776
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a wrongful discharge claim where an employee was terminated for refusing to violate antitrust law
  • denying a motion to strike a preliminary statement where the statement “was sufficiently clear so as to enable each Defendant to effectively formulate a response”
  • employee notified police that employer’s trucks were overloaded in violation of state law
  • employee notified police that employer’s trucks were overloaded in violation of state law
  • employee notified police that employer’s trucks were overloaded in violation of state law
  • employee notified police that employer's trucks were overloaded in violation of state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.