· 6/30/1982
Shaw v. Russell Trucking Line, Inc.
Citations
- 542 F. Supp. 776
- 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13725
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a wrongful discharge claim where an employee was terminated for refusing to violate antitrust law
- denying a motion to strike a preliminary statement where the statement “was sufficiently clear so as to enable each Defendant to effectively formulate a response”
- employee notified police that employer’s trucks were overloaded in violation of state law
- employee notified police that employer’s trucks were overloaded in violation of state law
- employee notified police that employer’s trucks were overloaded in violation of state law
- employee notified police that employer's trucks were overloaded in violation of state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mansmann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.