Shaw v. Frost

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the PHRA is to “be construed liberally” and that the definition of places of public accommodation “is broad and all inclusive”
• holding appellee precluded from challenging propriety of amended final order — issue decided adversely to it by Commonwealth Court — where failed to raise same in cross-appeal
• adopting standard enunciated in Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 216, 85 S. Ct. 398, 406-07 (1964)
• adopting standard enunciated in Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 216, 85 S. Ct. 398, 406-07 (1964)
• primary rule of construction is to determine intent of legislature and all other rules are secondary
• “The term ‘include’ is to be dealt with as a word of enlargement and not limitation[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).