Shaw v. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding an inmate’s grievance requesting a procedure available only to inmates enrolled in a Sex Offender Treatment Program did not put the prison on notice that he was requesting re-enrollment in the program
• “All the grievance need do is object intelligibly to some asserted shortcoming.” (quoting Strong v. David, 297 F.3d 646, 650 (7th Cir. 2002)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Ridenour v. Collins
  S.D. Ohio· 2010-02-10· cited 6×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Woodford v. Ngo
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 8,220×
• Wilkinson v. Dotson
  Supreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 2,909×
• Pruitt v. Mote
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-10-03· cited 2,834×
• McKune v. Lile
  Supreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 910×
• Van Dyke Johnson v. Stephen Doughty, Doctor, John Cearlock, Don Hinderliter
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-01-17· cited 821×
• Dion Strong v. Alphonso David
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-07-23· cited 488×
• William J. Prater v. U.S. Parole Commission and Thomas Keohane, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-10-03· cited 74×
• Richard L. Grennier v. Matthew J. Frank
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-07-05· cited 57×
• Hammer v. Ashcroft
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-01-15· cited 19×