Shaw v. City of Mayfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a similar argument that Facebook's terms of service amount to a representation that it will monitor third party content and explaining that the relevant terms of service are intended to impose an obligation on the user, not Facebook
• CDA barred claims for defamation, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law
• “To properly plead breach of contract, ‘[t]he complaint must identify the specific provision of the contract allegedly breached by the defendant.’” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
• “To properly plead breach of contract, ‘[t]he complaint must identify the specific provision of the contract allegedly breached by the defendant.’” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
• \You will NOT impersonate any person or entity....\
• taking judicial notice of terms of service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).