Shaw v. City of Ecorse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a] temporal connection between protected activity and an adverse employment action does not, in and of itself, establish a causal connection”
• stating that “[a] temporal connection between protected activity and an adverse employment action does not, in and of itself, establish a causal connection, . . . but it is evidence of causation”
• noting that a jury award must be supported by the evidence
• noting that a jury award must be supported by the evidence
• finding a question of fact existed where a plaintiff presented evidence of a temporal connection between protected activity and adverse employment action as well as evidence that the actions taken against him were “unusual.”
• “[a] temporal connection between protected activity and an adverse employment action does not, in and of itself, establish a casual connection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).