Seventh Circuit· 3/6/1963
Shaw-Barton, Inc. v. John Baumgarth Co., Inc.
Citations
- 313 F.2d 167
Judges: Hastings, Schnackenberg, Swygert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- H-D Michigan, Inc. v. Top Quality Service, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2007-08-02· cited 57×
- Karmikel Corp. v. May Dept. Stores Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 1987-04-20· cited 20×
- Brown v. QuiniouS.D. New York· 1990-08-01· cited 16×
- Tigrett Industries, Inc. v. Top Value Enterprises, Inc.W.D. Tennessee· 1963-05-21· cited 7×
- Unnamed caseSeventh Circuit· 1973-09-11· cited 6×
- Chattanoga Manufacturing, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2001-03-16· cited 5×
- UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION v. Ever-Ready Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1975-02-18· cited 2×
- Church & Dwight Co., Inc. v. Mayer Laboratories, Inc.N.D. California· 2012-04-12· cited 2×
- Homemakers Home & Health Care Services, Inc. v. Chicago Home for the FriendlessSeventh Circuit· 1973-09-11· cited 1×
- H-D Michigan Inc v. Top Quality ServiceSeventh Circuit· 2007-08-02
- Planalytics, Inc.Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2004-03-30
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court· 1916-02-21· cited 288×
- Independent Nail & Packing Co., Inc. v. Stronghold Screw Products, IncSeventh Circuit· 1953-07-09· cited 89×
- General Shoe Corporation v. RosenFourth Circuit· 1940-04-10· cited 40×
- John Morrell & Co. v. Reliable Packing Co.Seventh Circuit· 1961-10-18· cited 37×
- G. Leblanc Corporation v. H. & A. Selmer, Inc., G. Leblanc Corporation v. H. & A. Selmer, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1962-12-17· cited 30×
- Wilhartz v. Turco Products, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1947-12-23· cited 20×
- Bonne Bell, Inc. v. Lanolin Plus Cosmetics, Inc.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1953-03-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.