Shaw-Baker v. Geico Auto Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that failure to take fundamental steps to further a client’s case is a violation of MLRPC 1.1
• concluding that failure to take “necessary, fundamental steps to further the client’s case” is a violation of Rule 1.1
• concluding that the failure to take fundamental steps to further a client’s case is a violation of Rule 1.1
• concluding that a fee became unreasonable due to the attorney’s neglect of the matter and abandonment of representation
• holding that an attorney violated MLRPC 1.1 by failing to take the “necessary, fundamental steps to further the clients’ case[ ]”
• concluding that failure to take “necessary, fundamental steps to further the client’s case” is a violation of MLRPC 1.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).