Shavers v. Shavers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘A judgment denying a motion for new trial is an interlocutory order, not a final appealable judgment.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Babineaux v. University Medical Center
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2015-11-04· cited 27×
• McClure v. City of Pineville
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-12-06· cited 26×
• Ellias v. Ellias
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-03-01· cited 9×
• Norbert v. Norbert
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1982-05-13· cited 8×
• Duckering v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2016-03-02· cited 8×
• Bank of Jena v. Clark
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-06-27· cited 6×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1969-06-09· cited 60×
• Fruehauf Trailer Company v. Baillio
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1968-04-29· cited 53×
• Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1967-06-05· cited 47×
• Sonnier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1971-05-04· cited 42×
• General Motors Accept. Corp. v. Deep South Pest Con.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1965-03-29· cited 39×
• King v. King
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1971-12-13· cited 15×
• Succession of Saragusa
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1963-04-01· cited 8×
• General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Deep South Pest Control, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1964-06-01· cited 8×
• W. L. Pace Piano Co. v. Louisiana Seeburg Piano Co.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1923-10-22· cited 7×