Shaver v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants had no reasonable expectation of privacy in an area that was not restricted from public view by means of a fence, shrubbery, or other barrier
• holding that defendants had no reasonable expectation of privacy in an area that was not restricted from public view by means of a fence, shrubbery, or other barrier
• noting that \investigators intended to speak with the defendants\ and that the investigators first \knocked on the front door of the residence but no one answered\
• noting that “investigators intended to speak with the defendants” and that the investigators first “knocked on the front door of the residence but no one answered”
• finding that “conceal[ing] facts” regarding the acquisition of the stolen property and paying a “patently low price” for it implies guilty knowledge
• noting that “investigators intended to speak with the defendants” and that the investigators first “knocked on the front door of the residence but no one answered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).