Skip to main content
· 3/11/2024

Shaunna Lynn Shaw v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that state court 16 adjudicates claim on the merits when it disposes of claim on 17 the merits and reduces its disposition to judgment, whether or 18 not state court made explicit reference to federal case law
  • holding petitioner failed to establish prejudice from 13-year delay in adjudicating motion to withdraw guilty plea
  • refusing to grant relief due to failure to show prejudice after a thirteen-year delay between conviction and appeal
  • discussing prejudice in speedy appeal context after remand to district court to determine whether petitioner suffered any prejudice due to delay
  • “There have been rare situations where the federal courts have been obliged to grant the writ because of excessive delay in state post-conviction proceedings.”
  • absent actual prejudice thirteen-year delay was not a violation of due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.