Shaun House v. Akorn, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that physicians notes, letters in the record, and plaintiffs prolonged leave created a genuine issue of fact regarding a record of impairment
• recognizing that in some circumstances, “overriding federal interests require an 17 application of federal law” when state law would otherwise apply
• holding that McDonnell Douglas burden shifting approach and not Oregon prima facie case rule applied to Oregon claims in federal court on diversity jurisdiction
• recognizing that in some circumstances, “overriding federal interests require an 23 application of federal law” when state law would otherwise apply
• explaining that a nondiscriminatory and non-pretextual reason for termination is a defense to an ADA claim
• finding that equal treatment of other similarly situated employees outside of plaintiff's protected class weighs against finding pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).