Shaulson v. Shaulson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court’s order, in which court found that husband had dissipated $150,000 to furnish his new home and cred- ited that amount against husband in division of assets, was not improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Yao Gong v. Xuanwei Huang
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-31· cited 10×
• Hawley Avenue Associates, LLC v. Robert D. Russo, M.D. & Associates Radiology, P.C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-23· cited 8×
• Clelford v. Bristol
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-05-13
• Fronsaglia v. Fronsaglia
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-02-23
• Shaulson v. Shaulson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-02-17
• K. S. v. R. S.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-11-13

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Remillard v. Remillard
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-13· cited 67×
• Maturo v. Maturo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-04· cited 65×
• Favrow v. Vargas
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-16· cited 60×
• Finan v. Finan
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-01· cited 31×
• Bee v. Bee
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-10-07· cited 25×
• Kunajukr v. Kunajukr
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-06-22· cited 21×
• Gershman v. Gershman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-08· cited 17×
• Gentile v. Carneiro
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-05-13· cited 16×

Other cases named Shaulson v. Shaulson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Shaulson v. Shaulson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-02-17