Shaulson v. Shaulson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court’s order, in which court found that husband had dissipated $150,000 to furnish his new home and cred- ited that amount against husband in division of assets, was not improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).