Shatz v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The alleged infringer need not demonstrate that the noninfringing alternative in fact existed at the time but must establish that it was more than theoretically possible, and in fact available to be marketed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).