Shattuck v. Precision-Toyota, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is a long-standing policy of the law to interpret a contract whenever reasonable and possible in such a way as to uphold the contract”
• \It is a long-standing policy of the law to interpret a contract whenever reasonable and possible in such a way as to uphold the contract\
• “[A]n illusory contract is unenforceable for lack of mutuality____ [A] contract must have mutuality of obligation, and an agreement which permits one party to withdraw at his pleasure is void.”
• “It is a long-standing policy of the law to 27 interpret a contract whenever reasonable and possible in such a way as to uphold the 28 contract.”
• \[i]t 15 is a long-standing policy of the law to interpret a contract whenever reasonable and possible 16 in such a way as to uphold the contract.\
• valid contract requires mutual irrevocable promises by both parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-09-01· cited 213×
• In Re Cochise College Park, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-03-11· cited 211×
• Smith v. Melson, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-25· cited 74×
• Charles I. Friedman, P.C. v. Microsoft Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-08-24· cited 55×
• Pyeatte v. Pyeatte
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-28· cited 53×
• Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life Insurance
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-07· cited 52×
• Bender v. Bender
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-04-17· cited 50×
• Tri-County Electric Ass'n v. City of Gillette
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1978-08-24· cited 48×
• Hutcherson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-30· cited 41×
• Horizon Corp. v. Westcor, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-09-27· cited 33×
• Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-11-10· cited 31×
• Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLC
  D. Arizona· 2011-10-05· cited 29×
• Byke Const. Co., Inc. v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-02-16· cited 11×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-11-01· cited 10×
• Scafidi v. Puckett
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-03-02· cited 7×
• Rushing v. Lovelace-Bataan Health Program
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-07-09· cited 7×
• Jackson Hole Builders v. Piros
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1982-11-23· cited 6×
• Century Medical Plaza v. Goldstein
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-05-08· cited 5×
• BMW of North America, LLC v. Mini Works, LLC
  D. Arizona· 2010-03-08· cited 4×
• In Re Redpath Computer Services, Inc.
  D. Arizona· 1995-05-15· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-12-07· cited 79×
• Naify v. Pacific Indemnity Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1938-02-25· cited 56×
• Ellis v. Dodge Bros.
  N.D. Georgia· 1916-10-19· cited 14×
• Hall v. Rankin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1920-12-07· cited 11×