Shattuck v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence of discrimination against other employees of plaintiff’s protected class is “highly probative” of discrimination against the plaintiff
• “would have fired” standard, rather than “would not have hired” standard, applies to after-acquired evidence of résumé fraud in discriminatory discharge case
• ‘There is no proscription of evidence of discrimination against other members of the plaintiff’s protected class; to the contrary, such evidence may be highly probative, depending on the circumstances.’ (collecting cases)
• “There is no proscription of evidence of discrimination against other members of the plaintiff’s protected class; to the contrary, such evidence may be highly probative, depending on the circumstances.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).