Shatterproof Glass Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Libbey-Owens Ford Company and Leybold-Heraeus Gmbh, Appellants/cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a new trial is required only on a showing of either prejudicial error or a verdict against the clear weight of the evidence
• holding terms “whenever the engine is overrunning” and “considerable fuel saving” indefinite as a matter of law
• upholding a court-ordered royalty based on sales as a remedy for continuing operations
• upholding a courtordered royalty based on sales as a remedy for continuing operations
• new trial appropriate when there was prejudicial error, or when verdict against weight of the evidence
• a reasonable jury could have found that “apparatus and method of the claims were not functional”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).