Skip to main content
· 3/2/2005

Sharpston v. State

Citations

  • 895 So. 2d 1225
  • 2005 WL 473965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing revocation in which the violation was based solely on defendant's arrest
  • \Not once was Sharpston asked whether he actually committed the crime.\
  • \Not once was Sharpston asked whether he actually committed the crime.\
  • \Not once was Sharpston asked whether he actually committed the crime.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northcutt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.