Sharpless v. Sim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting carrier’s argument that driver was not statutory employee because he was independent contractor
• “Although [juror’s] violation of the court’s admonitory instruction against independent investigation had the potential to cause harm, the act itself is not sufficiently prejudicial to justify a presumption of harm.”
• applying Barbour’s three-part test to determine statutory employer status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).