Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/2/1999
Sharpe v. Case Produce, Inc.
Citations
- 519 S.E.2d 102
- 336 S.C. 154
- 1999 S.C. LEXIS 149
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that [t]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent the Commissions finding from being supported by substantial evidence
- holding the findings of the workers compensation commission that a claimant did not suffer a work-related injury were sufficient where the commission based its decision on the lack of credibility of the claimant and on the credibility of the employers witnesses
- stating the final determination of witness credibility and the weight to be accorded evidence is reserved to the Appellate Panel and it is not the task of this court to weigh the evidence
- “Where there is a conflict in the evidence, the Commission’s findings of fact are conclusive.”
- \The possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent the Commission's finding from being supported by substantial evidence.\
- “The possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent the Commission's finding from being supported by substantial evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hargrove v. Titan Textile Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-07-12· cited 85×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 57×
- Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 57×
- Anderson v. Baptist Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-16· cited 44×
- Lockridge v. Santens of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-02-20· cited 39×
- Hill v. Eagle Motor LinesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-05-21· cited 34×
- Gadson v. Mikasa Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-02-21· cited 31×
- Bass v. Kenco GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-11-21· cited 30×
- Houston v. Deloach & DeloachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-10· cited 26×
- Hall v. Desert Aire, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-12-20· cited 25×
- Hall v. United Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-23· cited 24×
- Langdale v. CARPETSCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-07-20· cited 23×
- Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-10-24· cited 21×
- Shuler v. Gregory ElectricCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-11-07· cited 21×
- Pee v. AVM, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-11-25· cited 16×
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-10-23· cited 16×
- Bursey v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-01· cited 11×
- Barton v. HiggsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 9×
- South Carolina Second Injury Fund v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-01-27· cited 8×
- Thompson Ex Rel. Harvey v. CISSON CONST.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-02-01· cited 7×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-08· cited 88×
- Clade v. Champion LaboratoriesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-02-23· cited 32×
- Hoxit v. Michelin Tire Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 20×
- McGuffin v. Schlumberger-SangamoSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-02-10· cited 15×
- Rogers v. Kunja Knitting Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-24· cited 15×
- Sharpe v. Case Produce Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-12-22· cited 6×
- Rhodes v. Guignard Brick WorksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-02-09· cited 6×
- Minor v. PHILIPS PRODUCTSSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-12-29· cited 3×
- Rogers v. Kunja Knitting Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-04-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.