Sharpe v. Case Produce, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent the Commission’s finding from being supported by substantial evidence”
• holding the findings of the workers’ compensation commission that a claimant did not suffer a work-related injury were sufficient where the commission based its decision on the lack of credibility of the claimant and on the credibility of the employer’s witnesses
• stating the final determination of witness credibility and the weight to be accorded evidence is reserved to the Appellate Panel and it is not the task of this court to weigh the evidence
• “Where there is a conflict in the evidence, the Commission’s findings of fact are conclusive.”
• \The possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent the Commission's finding from being supported by substantial evidence.\
• “The possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent the Commission's finding from being supported by substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).