· 9/30/2008
Sharpe v. Bair
Citations
- 580 F. Supp. 2d 123
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76057
- 2008 WL 4443937
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to prove pretext, a plaintiff must articulate specific and “significantly probative” evidence that a defendant’s provided reasons were false
- observing that a plaintiff may use “indirect evidence” to support an inference that an employer took an action because of the plaintiff’s membership in a protected class
- a paralegal and an attorney in the same law firm were not similarly situated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reggie B. Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.