Sharpe Holdings, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming grant of preliminary injunction to religious objectors because “they [were] likely to succeed on the merits of their RFRA challenge to the contraceptive mandate and the accommodation regulations”
• TPAs have no “wholly independent obligation” to provide contraceptive coverage
• TPAs have no “wholly independent obligation” to provide contraceptive coverage
• TPAs have no “wholly independent obligation” to provide contraceptive coverage
• collecting cases contrary to the Government’s position
• collecting cases contrary to the Government’s position

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).