Skip to main content
· 5/24/1898

Sharp v. Sturgeon

Citations

  • 75 Mo. App. 651
  • 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a taxing official’s bald assertions and descriptions of' how it recalculated a taxpayer’s income tax liability failed to show that the statutory formula did not fairly represent the taxpayer’s in-state business activities
  • holding bald assertions by the DOR’s witnesses that it satisfied the threshold question was not enough to meet its burden
  • holding the threshold issue is whether the statutory formula fairly represents a taxpayer’s business activity within South Carolina
  • \the proponent of the alternate formula bears the burden of prolof] by a preponderance of the evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biggs, Bland, Bond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.