Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/12/1994

Sharp v. Sharp

Citations

877 P.2d 304
179 Ariz. 205
169 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
1994 Ariz. App. LEXIS 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating “it is possible for the trial court to decide by summary judgment whether an agreement is equitable”
rejecting claim that wife signed agreement under duress because she could have called her attorney a second time or mailed a letter when her attorney did not accept her collect call
rejecting claim that wife signed agreement under duress because she could have called her attorney a second time or mailed a letter when the attorney did not take her collect call
Wife alleged “undue influence and overbearing tactics,” “extreme emotional distress,” financial manipulation during the negotiations, and that husband would not communicate with her through counsel.
court must consider all the evidence before it concerning the agreement, as well as the parties, their relation, ages, finances, opportunities, and contributions to the community estate
the superior court “is obliged to achieve a fair and equitable distribution of the property and is ‘not foreclosed from doing so by the parties’ . . . agreement.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich, Grant, Voss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.