Sharp v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting Ford’s motion for summary judgment after finding that loading and unloading vehicles “was not a one-time project”
• finding a car maker immune to a claim by a employee of a sub-subcontractor
• “The only question that remains, then, is whether the work being performed by the plaintiff [was] ‘a regular or recurrent part of [the defendant’s business].’”
• “The only question that remains, then, is whether the work being performed by the plaintiff [was] ‘a regular or recurrent part of [the defendant’s business].” ’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).