Skip to main content
· 7/1/1868

Sharp v. Brunnings

Citations

  • 35 Cal. 528
  • 1868 Cal. LEXIS 122

Syllabus

<p>Jurisdiction of the Persons of Defendants.—Where S. and B. admitted “due service” of the summons in an action against them and others, the Court thereby acquired jurisdiction of them, and as to them the judgment was valid.</p> <p>Idem.—Where the decree in an action by M. against S., B., and others, for foreclosure of a mortgage, recited that “the defendants above named, having been duly served with process, * * * as appears by the proof of service of the process issued herein and on file in this action,” etc.: Held, that this recital, under the rule in Halm v. Kelly, 34 Cal. 390, is conclusive in favor of the jurisdiction of the Court of the persons of said defendants.</p>

Judges: Rhodes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.